Doug PollardCourage and Cowardice in Politics
Clem Newton-Brown
They call it ‘going into public life’, but in actual fact, the last thing Australian politicians want is to be publicly observed in honest action.
In public, Tony Abbott and Joe Hockey pretend they are closer than locker-room buddies, cheerfully waiting for Malcolm Turnbull to arrive for a three-way game of squash. In private they can barely tolerate each other.
Joe De Bruyn
Meanwhile over on the notionally progressive side of the aisle, Gillard is paralysed by having to ride three horses at once: one faction chained to Rome by Joe De Bruyn, one as devoted to the polls as De Bruyn is to Rome, and one desperately wishing they dared be progressive, if only it didn’t hurt.
And then there’s Bob Katter and the other temperamental show ponies.
It’s the same in Victoria. There’s a big crevasse right through the middle of the coalition government, with rigid hard-heads like the Attorney General on one side, and small-l wets like Mental Health Minister Mary Wooldridge on the other; a crevasse so wide that in trying to bestride it, Ted Baillieu finds himself perpetually off balance, unable to move, and in constant danger of emasculation.
What the situation everywhere calls for is courage and daring, but somehow those qualities have been squeezed out of our parties and parliaments. Seats are filled by the same kind of colourless drones who sit in cubicles in call centres, parroting the same script over and over again. And no-one dares to be Jason.
When the vote to restore the special rights and privileges of the nominally religious came up for a vote in Melbourne recently, the best the Liberal wets could manage was for Mary Wooldridge to turn up too late to vote, and even that’s being sold as an accident.
Heaven forfend that any dissenting member should dare to actually express outright opposition to this pernicious piece of nonsense. They didn’t dare.
When the aforementioned Joe De Bruyn produced that hoariest of discredited chestnuts last week, claiming that poufs brought down the Roman Empire and gay marriage would be the end of civilisation, did Julia laugh in his face, tell him to go easy on the communion wine and take a Trappist retreat for the next ten years? She didn’t dare.
Hilary Clinton
The cowardice is especially noticeable when it comes to teh gay. Hilary Clinton may tell the world that gay rights are human rights. Conservative British government ministers may pledge public support and embassy assistance in fighting homophobia worldwide. The European Parliament may refuse admittance to homophobic countries.
But try getting an Australian politician from either of the main parties to consistently and publicly support, defend and spruik for our community, and they start making like Ronald Reagan in the AIDS years, when he let thousands die rather than utter the word ‘gay’.
And then they wonder why we get mad at them. It’s simple. We expect better.
Current Affairs
Rainbow Reporter
All things equal
LETTER-WRITERS have claimed that the government's amendments to the Equal Opportunity Act will give religious organisations the power to sack employees on the basis of their "lifestyle" and deny services to individuals on discriminatory grounds. Both claims are false.
The government's amendments simply continue the position that enables faith-based organisations to employ people who share their faith. This has been the position since 1995 and it enjoyed bipartisan support until Labor's legislation last year sought to deny faith-based organisations that freedom from August 1 this year.
The amendments make no change to the law regarding provision of services by faith-based organisations.
The government's amendments seek to restore a fair and sensible balance between preventing discrimination while also respecting freedom of association.
Robert Clark, Attorney-General
Read more: Really Long Link